Abstract
The public university in South Africa continues to propagate capitalist, competitive and neoliberal agendas that are inconsistent with agendas that could be considered to be of public good. These market-orientated logics and discourses have compromised teaching in the university because of increased casualisation of faculty as a result of cost cutting and commodification of education meant to realise artificial efficiency. This has meant that faculty are now confronted with larger class sizes to teach and less support in the process. This approach to teaching has framed the academic project as an individual pursuit rather than a collective one. Thus, the academic project has been reduced to a project that only generates unequal and impossible expectations. In this article, aided by coloniality and decoloniality as my preferred philosophical orientations, I propose decolonial love as one transformative pedagogical approach that university teachers can employ in the implementation of their mandate, which is to teach and educate students for the epistemic, human, social and public good. I argue that such an approach to teaching would and can contribute to the promotion of transgression of knowledge boundaries for knowledge co-construction and thus enable a way of teaching that promotes pluriversal (situated) knowledges.
Contribution: I also assert that by employing decolonial love as a pedagogical approach, university teachers can come to value what their students bring to their lecture rooms and thus use cultural heritage of their students to develop innovative pedagogies that are culturally relevant and also underpinned by a pedagogy rooted in love.
Keywords: coloniality; decoloniality; decolonial love; neoliberal university; pedagogy; South Africa.
Introduction
In this article, I attempt to do three things. Firstly, I critique the South African public university for embracing, foregrounding and reinforcing neoliberal capitalism and its market-orientated fundamentalism in its regimes and discourses. Secondly, I trace and review literature that speaks to the lived experiences of university teachers existing in and teaching and learning at a neoliberalised public university to emphasise and highlight how inhumane and unhealthy are neoliberal logics to university teachers and their students. Thirdly, and in thinking beyond the neoliberalised teaching approach, I propose to faculty to consider adopting decolonial love as a pedagogical approach. I do all of this guided by coloniality and decoloniality as my philosophical orientations.
Philosophical orientations
Two philosophical orientations underpinned this study. The first is coloniality because of its relationship with neoliberalism and market fundamentalism (Hlatshwayo 2022), and the second is decoloniality.
The concept of coloniality was first coined by Quijano ([1989] 2000) in an essay titled ‘Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America’, to make sense of and articulate the enduring impact and continued effects of colonialism on the structures of power, knowledge, being and culture on the entire world generally and the global South in its entirety. However, some decolonial theorists such as Grosfuguel (2007) have since argued that coloniality cannot be reduced to the absence or presence of colonial administration, nor to the economic and political structures of power. Because of this, coloniality has since been differentiated from colonialism, and according to Maldonado-Torres (2007):
Colonialism denotes a political and economic relation in which the sovereignty of a nation or a people rests on the power of another nation, which makes such a nation an empire. Coloniality, instead, refers to long-standing patterns of power that emerged as a result of colonialism, but that define culture, labour, intersubjectivity relations, and knowledge production well beyond the strict limits of colonial administrations. Thus, coloniality survives colonialism. It is maintained alive in books, in the criteria for academic performance, in cultural patterns, in common sense, in the self-image of peoples, in aspirations of self, and so many other aspects of our modern experience. In a way, as modern subjects we breathe coloniality all the time and every day. (p. 243)
Essentially, coloniality is the manifestation of colonialism in the present and was introduced simultaneously with the beginning of the violent Euro-Western modernity (Ford 2023). It appears and is expressed in many guises (Davids 2019). For instance, it is visible and evidenced in curricula (knowledge), pedagogies, assessment strategies, as well as ‘the general operative logic of the school [or university], i.e., learners’ [or students] codes of conduct, schools’ [or university’s] visions, mission statements’ (Maluleka 2021a:75). This is because it reproduces itself in various dialectical yet interrelated domains that include and not limited to ‘coloniality of power’, ‘coloniality of knowledge’ and ‘coloniality of being’, that is, the colonial matrix of power (Mignolo 2007; Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013).
The first dimension of this matrix is the coloniality of power, which refers to a logic of domination and subjugation by the global North to the rest of the world, especially the global South. This power is expressed through dialectical yet interrelated domains, which include the control of the economy, control of (political authority), control of gender and sexuality, as well as control of knowledge and subjectivity (see Grosfuguel 2007; Mignolo 2005). In Africa, Kwame Nkrumah (1966) termed this kind of power ‘neo-colonialism’, and then, Walter Rodney (1972) delineated how this power is articulated on the continent.
The second dimension is the coloniality of knowledge, which explains the continued monopolisation of knowledge production by the global North – what Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2018) calls the ‘cognitive empire’. In other words, it speaks to the intellectual and epistemological colonisation that the global South continues to suffer at the hands of the global North (Hlatshwayo 2022). In turn, this form of colonisation continues to result in the systematic and institutional exclusion of other forms of knowledge and pedagogies, especially in the public university (Boughey & McKenna 2021).
The third dimension is the coloniality of being, which explains the Manichean allegoric mode of binaries that continue to be used to categorise people and their culture as either Christian or barbarian, good or evil, primitive or civilised, inferior or superior, rational or irrational, white or black, knowledge or myths and developed or undeveloped (Maldonado-Torres 2016). This is best captured by René Descartes’ famous statement cogito ergo sum:
I think therefore I am’, which based ‘on the understanding that because ‘I am’ [that is, ontology], what I then think is valid, legitimate and constitutes universal knowledge [that is, epistemology]. (Hlatshwayo 2022:3)
However, this position fails to recognise that indigenous people of the global South understood existentialism to be inclusive and collective. For instance, in many parts of the African continent, they speak of an Ubuntu perspective – I am because we are, that is, an existential cognatus sum, ergo sumus [I am related, therefore we are].
Therefore, I use coloniality as a philosophical orientation to make sense of how a neoliberalised public university in South Africa, through the use of pedagogical approaches aligned to it, perpetuates colonial ways of knowing, being and becoming. I also make use of coloniality to explore, understand and theorise about how the public university in South Africa continues to promulgate pedagogies of neoliberalism through hegemonic networks aided by the existence of coloniality itself.
To counter the neoliberalisation of the public university and its teachings, I employed decoloniality as another philosophical orientation, which centres decolonial love. Ndlovu-Gatsheni considers decoloniality as ‘aimed at setting afoot a new humanity free from racial hierarchization and asymmetrical power relations in place since conquest’ (Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2015:488). In other words, decoloniality speaks to various efforts, be it pedagogical, epistemic, political or ontological, meant to contribute to the rehumanisation of both the dehumaniser and the dehumanised (Freire 1970). To rehumanise also means disregarding any form of hierarchy that perpetuates the imposed superiority and inferiority complexes that human beings harbour (Dube 2021; Wynter 2003), as well as an attempt to break away from:
[H]ierarchies of difference that dehumanize subjects and communities and that destroy nature, and to the production of counter-discourses, counter-knowledges, counter-creative acts, and counter-practices that seek to dismantle coloniality and to open up multiple other forms of being in the world. (Maldonado-Torres 2016:10)
This is where love for humanity finds most expression because by rehumanising all human beings through decolonial love as decoloniality, we can recognise and embrace all forms of knowledge, ways of being, becoming, thinking and acting (Davids 2019).
So, I use decoloniality as a philosophical orientation to argue for the centrality of decolonial love by university teachers in exercising their pedagogy. In other words, I use decolonial love to make sense of and theorise about how public university teachers can counter the dehumanising colonial and neoliberal pedagogical influences in the lecture rooms and in the university in general for pedagogies that are humanising and underpinned by love.
A critique of a neoliberalised South African public university
There is no doubt that the public university and its educational offerings play a vital role in making sure that nation states, individually and collectively, can contribute to the development of their people in ways, including and not limited to economic, sociocultural and political development (Akala 2021). These public good efforts have been well articulated and theorised (see Badat 2011; Naidoo 2010; Nussbaum 1999; Sen 1993). However, since the 1970s and the 1980s, both in the global South and global North, there have been concerted attempts towards making sure that neoliberal regimes underpin public institutions such as the public university (Akala 2021; Hlatshwayo 2022). These efforts were largely informed by the adoption of austerity policies by governments that were an attempt then, even today, to reduce government investments and spending in public institutions such as the public university (Mamdani 2007). The reduction of government spending in its public institutions and social targets was largely informed by a new economic model underpinned by neoliberalism. This economic model was introduced and led by institutions such as the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It was sold to the global South as a model meant to reduce in the interim and certainly in the long run the rampant corruption by the elite class, bad governance structures and leadership, poorly formulated economic policies, as well as ease and mitigate financial woes that many countries of global South continue to experience (see Collins & Rhoades 2010; Hahn 2007). Because of this, the WB and the IMF as lending institutions imposed to the countries of the global South that they were and are lending money too – to commodify, marketise and corporatise their economic policies. In other words, part of the terms and conditions of their loans forced and continues to force these governments to adopt austerity measures that translated to higher taxes imposed on ordinary citizens and the reduction of public spending meant to eliminate budget deficits and consolidate debt. All of these have been justified by the WB and IMF as calculated measures meant to make sure that those governments receiving loans from them are self-sustainable in future. This meant that public institutions such as the public university were and continue to operate in a very competitive environment with limited budgetary resources. To mitigate this reality, the public university has since been compelled to adopt neoliberal policies, especially in its operational and epistemic logics, in order to stay afloat. However, this was done despite the serious implications that this move might have on the academic project itself, the physical and mental well-being of faculty and their students (Brock-Utne 2003; Peet 2002), as well as on the notion of the public university and its education as a public good (Akala 2021; Brown 2015; Shore 2010).
For instance, most global South nations are still trying to make sense of and recover from the colonial moments and experiences that they had to endure; many of these nations were forced to ignore the lived experiences and contexts of their people (Akala 2021). That is why some theorists (see Saunders 2015; Ward 2012) and, more recently, Hlatshwayo (2022) have argued that the ‘corporate colonisation’ of the public university from the 1970s and 1980s had amended:
[… T]he purposes of a university towards the needs of the industrialised state and its neoliberal benefactors. Thus, rather than imagining and enacting an inclusive and transformative curricula and pedagogy, the focus in the global North [and South] was on what the market needs and how universities could best support them. It is in this early moment that we begin to see the coloniality of power and the coloniality of being aligning in the academy to produce new forms of marginality for the university, academics and students. (p. 4)
In South Africa, the Council on Higher Education (CHE) (2000) has since advocated for the need to strike a balance between the market demands and the public university:
Higher Education must play a central role in meeting the difficult realities of international competition in an environment of rapid global change, driven, as it is, by momentous changes in information and knowledge production systems. (p. 5)
This decision by the CHE is informed by the White Paper 3 on Higher Education that was published by the then Department of Education (DoE) in 1997, which emphasised the need for the South African public university to work towards fulfilling the needs of the labour market ‘in a knowledge-driven and knowledge-dependent society, with the ever-changing high-level competencies and expertise necessary for growth and prosperity of a modern economy’ (DoE 1997:10).
All of these decisions by both the CHE and DoE continue to have unfortunate outcomes for those of us who exist in and teach in a neoliberalised public university in South Africa.
Existing and teaching in a neoliberalised public university in South Africa
Over the years, a lot has been theorised about existing and teaching in a neoliberalised public university in South Africa. Some of these theorisations argue that the neoliberalisation of the public university in South Africa resulted in significant shifts in the priorities and practices of the public university in South Africa (Koopman & Koopman 2021). Hence, Ndofirepi and Hungwe (2022) argued that neoliberalisation of the public university in South Africa is responsible for perpetuating Eurocentric canons, on the one hand, and overshadowing the public good agenda of a public university, on the other hand.
Hlatshwayo and Ngcobo (2023) argued that the ‘publish or perish’ discourse rooted in neoliberalism and its pitfalls is partly responsible for the current state of the public university in South Africa that continues to dehumanise and compromise the mental well-being of faculty and their students. Because of this, Hlatshwayo and Majozi (2024) observed and argued that the neoliberalisation of the public university in South Africa has led to a situation whereby research outputs and research grant accumulations are most valued because of their ability to generate money for the university to stay aloft over the mental state of faculty and their students, as well as the mandate of the university as a site for the promotion of public good initiatives. Mahabeer and Pirtheepal (2019) lamented the ‘massification’ of the public university because of its adverse effects on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Nyoni (2024) raised concerns about the massification of education within the public university as a phenomenon that continues to inform and shape the development of curricula that are exclusionary and fail to address the diverse needs of faculty and their students.
Because of these factors and others that were not highlighted because of the limited scope of this study, some senior African academics and students have recently theorised about their experiences as members of faculty in the South African Academy that is neoliberalised and characterised by forms of violence that include, but not limited to, racism, sexism, homophobia, discrimination and others (Khunou et al. 2019). One of these senior academics, Associate Professor Khoza-Shangase, has since pronounced that she now suffers from ‘intellectual and emotional toxicity’ for existing and teaching in a historically white university, which is now neoliberalised and is a space that continues to be anti-black in nature and form. She articulates her experiences below:
I have diagnosed myself as suffering from intellectual and emotional toxicity induced by racism, harassment, discrimination, and white privilege within the academy. Toxicity is defined as the degree to which a substance can damage an organism or the degree to which it can be poisonous (Campbell 2007).
In audiology, my field of practice and research, there is a phenomenon referred to as ototoxicity. Ototoxicity is the property of being toxic to the ear. This form of toxicity is commonly medication-induced, can be predictable but not always preventable, but can be identified, monitored, and managed to varying degrees of success. Imagine I, as a black female academic, with its culture, systems, and policies – this substance. My journey through higher education, through a black female student, to an associate professor in a historically white university, resonates and mirrors this phenomenon of toxicity exceptionally well. (Khoza-Shangase 2019:42)
Similarly, in a study conducted by Hlatshwayo (2015), one of the participants, a student named Mariah, reflected on her experiences with her choice of study that left her feeling marginalised epistemically and ontologically because of existing in a black body that could not articulate itself quite well in the English language. This is what she had to say:
The friends [Foundation Phase programme], it’s family. People think that, like you get there, and you find people in the same situation. Like people who also don’t feel they belong. You find people who’ve been to public school. They don’t speak better English. They don’t write academically. Their academic writing is poor. And the struggle is the same. You kinda blend with them because you understand, ‘okay I’m not alone’. I’m not the only one. And there was never a point where we judged each other. We were just there for each other. We would just a crazy bunch together. We always walked together from class to class. (Mariah, in Hlatshwayo 2015:52)
In a similar study by Zulu (2021) exploring experiences of black women faculty existing in and teaching in neoliberalised public university, one of the participants, named Zulu (2021), lamented that:
Still, as a Black person you will still be overlooked, as you walk into a room a lot of [White] people are seeing you as a Black person, more than seeing you as an equal. (p. 249)
However, such moments of violence, marginality and oppression that Khoza-Shangase et al. have experienced and then elected to speak about are not unique to them. This is because for many who continue to experience such forms of brutality, disparage and abuse at the hands of the university itself, other faculty members, curricula, institutional culture and so on; it is difficult for them to make sense of those moments first, in order to then have the courage to speak about their experiences. Hence, according to Kiguwa, such moments ‘are often characterised by struggles in naming moments … Part of the struggle concerns ambivalent feelings of knowing and unknowing: second-guessing personal experiences of subjectification’ (Kiguwa 2019:11). Because of this, Kiguwa has since urged the black faculty to work towards ‘creating our own home’ within and across different public institutions (Kiguwa 2019:13).
This is important to do especially since having a strong presence of black faculty in the South African Academy can ensure diversity within the academic community is further entrenched. This can, in turn, result in a situation where united black faculty are then in a position to create and establish their own spaces within the academy that enable and empower them to then take ownership of their narratives, research agendas and educational initiatives. Moreover, these spaces can also be sites for rehumanisation, reassurance and reaffirmations, as well as sites where mentorship and support occur and where institutional barriers and forms of violence can be debated and challenged.
In essence, the neoliberalisation of the public university in South Africa continues to have dire consequences on teaching and learning practices, as well as the mental well-being of faculty and their students. Thus, it has become crucial that the public university in South Africa critically evaluate the impact of neoliberal ideologies on teaching and learning, as well as the mental state of the university community as a whole in order to safeguard the core mission of a public university, which is a mission rooted in cognitive, epistemic, social and ontological justice, and not solely informed, shaped and compromised by market-driven objectives. Equally, it is an opportune moment for university teachers to reimagine their pedagogical orientations and how they contribute to the public good of the academic project.
Understanding decolonial love
The violent legacies of colonialism, apartheid and, more recently, the presence of coloniality and neoliberal regimes that inflict pain and dehumanise those on the receiving end continue to characterise our public university and how teaching and learning occur in these spaces. Part of the issues is that:
Love is rarely taken seriously as political [epistemic or pedagogical] strategies in addressing the dire effects of colonialism and continued neo-colonial[, neoliberal] domination and exploitation. Yet key political movements of Black consciousness and black nationalism are centred on love to challenge self-hatred. (Makhubu & Mbongwa 2019:12)
How then do we work towards becoming better humans for ourselves and others in these neoliberalised public universities? How do we make a shift in our pedagogical orientations to create teaching and learning spaces that are (re)venerated and are characterised by love? How do we continuously work towards humanising each other? Maldonado-Torres (2016:22) suggested that we adopt what he calls ‘decolonial attitudes’ because such attitudes can create conditions necessary for love to flourish (Davids 2019).
What then is decolonial love? Sandoval describes decolonial love as a form of love, ‘a synchronic process that punctures through traditional, older narratives of love, that ruptures everyday being’ (Sandoval 2000:142). This love can be thought of as a humanising form of love that is concerned with radically embracing those of us who have been constructed as being unworthy of being loved, because ‘it compels [one] to choose [one]self, [it] has no space for any form of violence or abuse, [pedagogical, epistemic,] racial, sexual, ethnic, cultural and religious’ (Mbongwa cited in Makhubu & Mbongwa 2019:23). However, it also seeks to humanise those of us who are guilty of constructing others as being unworthy of being loved to be loved too (Maluleka 2021b). In other words, decolonial love ‘operates between those rendered other by hegemonic forces. In its acceptance of fluid identities and a redefined but shared humanity’ (Gräbner 2014:53). It also ‘promotes loving as an active, intersubjective process, and in so doing articulates an anti-hegemonic, anti-imperialist affect and attitude that can guide the actions that work to dismantle oppressive regimes’ (Gräbner 2014:54). Therefore, decolonial love encourages both the dehumanised and the dehumaniser to affirm, recognise and respect each other despite their differences (Hlatshwayo, Zondi & Mokoena 2023; Maluleka 2023a). This is because this kind of love recognises ‘alliance[s] and affection across lines of difference’. It is thus ‘the humanising task of building a world in which genuine ethical relations become the norm and not the exception’ (Maldonado-Torres 2008:187).
Sandoval (2000) also argued that love can be re-invented into many things such as pedagogical approaches that can, in turn, contribute to the reimagination of the self, the other and the world. Consequently, decolonial love can be considered an ethical pedagogical imperative that responds to the legacies of colonialism and apartheid, neoliberal capitalism and coloniality – all of which are characterised by instances of cognitive, epistemic, ontological and social harm.
A brief methodological note
Data for this article were drawn from the literature reviewed, especially literature concerned with existing and working in a neoliberalised public university in South Africa and how that is largely informed by the legacies of colonialism, apartheid and now coloniality. I was able to do this by employing a narrative and systemic review approach that, in turn, enabled me to engage existing research and its contributions towards our understanding of the lived experiences of those tasked and expected to teach in neoliberalised public university in South Africa. These methodological approaches also assisted me in positioning and contextualising this study within an already existing body of knowledge (Snyder 2019). They also allowed me to identify research gaps that need further research (Snyder 2019).
Teaching through and with decolonial love in a neoliberal South African University
There is certainly a need for pedagogies that perpetuate neoliberalism to be disrupted as they are rooted in colonial and apartheid logics, which continue to exist in and find expression in the public university. These are pedagogical forms that ‘seek to control bodies and bodies of knowledge’ (Ford & Jaramillo 2023:1). So, by disrupting them, that is, working towards transcending them, we would be contributing to the creation of teaching and learning spaces that do not continue to exile the dejected and marginalised among us. We would also ‘move against not only those forces which dehumanise us from the outside, but also against those oppressive values which we have been forced to take into ourselves’ (Lorde [1987] 2007:135). That is why decolonial love thought of as a radical pedagogy of love can assist in this endeavour. This is the kind of love that bells hooks refers to as ‘a combination of care, commitment, knowledge, responsibility, respect and trust’ (hooks 1994:131).
However, the act of disrupting pedagogies used in the public university that are underpinned by the neoliberal logic might be considered an inconsequential contribution, especially considering how massive the neoliberal project is and how far and wide its entrenchment is within the public university. Walsh’s (2016) concept of ‘decolonial cracks’ is very useful in not only justifying the need to employ decolonial praxis such as decolonial love as pedagogy but also framing how such praxis could be applied. Therefore, ‘decolonial cracks’ can enable university teachers to think about and use decolonial love as pedagogy to breathe life into tiny spaces, such as teaching and learning spaces, that have been consumed by neoliberal logics, as well as the legacies of colonialism and apartheid – with the hope of contributing to the disruption of the colossal through the tiny1. In other words, the cracks become sites from which action, resistance, insurgence and transgression are nurtured and advanced through alliances established within the said cracks.
This disruption process ought to begin with faculty and their students establishing and building authentic, reciprocal relationships between and among themselves (Hlatshwayo et al. 2023). This would, in turn, enable them to be in relationships that are grounded in care, compassion, love, respect, empathy and a commitment to mutual growth, liberation and rehumanisation. In this way, ‘genuine ethical relations become the norm and not the exception’ (Maluleka 2021b:84). These are relations that decolonial love advocates for them to be based on ‘an ethical principle, a basic negation of the system of domination, rather than a modulation of its conditions’ (De Lissovoy 2010:289). It is through the establishment of such relationships that faculty and their students can be better positioned to challenge and resist neoliberal logics that seek to reduce teaching and learning to a market-driven transaction that prioritises individual success, competition and profit over the collective’s humanity, success and well-being.
Then, decolonial love as a pedagogical approach can enable university teachers to adopt and apply Freire’s (1970) concept of conscientização into their teaching. However, this can also happen when and if faculty recognise, accept and understand their own fallibility and then rethink and reimagine the pedagogic relations between themselves and their students (Hlatshwayo et al. 2023). In so doing, they (faculty) will begin to recognise their students as knowers in their own right and that the knowledge that those students come with to their lecture rooms should also be valued and engaged (Maluleka 2023b). After this, faculty would be better positioned to empower their students, both the marginalised and the privileged, through critical reflections about historical inequalities and injustices that continue to find expression today. With this, the students will then be empowered and informed about what needs to be done, through dialogue and collaboration, in order to transform oppressive epistemic, cognitive, pedagogical, ontological and social structures.
Lastly, it is through pedagogical approaches, underpinned and anchored by decolonial love, that faculty can challenge Eurocentrism and colonial mentality that continue to be perpetuated through neoliberal logics. This would encourage students to question dominant narratives that seek to maintain the status quo within the academy and the world at large, challenge colonial stereotypes, as well as explore and apply alternative ways of acting, knowing and being that acknowledge and embrace other ways of acting, knowing and being.
Conclusion
The neoliberalisation of the public university in South Africa continues to frame faculty and its students as ‘scholars in the marketplace’ (Mamdani 2007). These are scholars who are expected to be content with the continued commodification, corporatisation and marketisation of the public university and its education at the expense of an academic project that is for cognitive, epistemic, ontological and social justice. Therefore, decolonial love, a radical pedagogical approach, offers an avenue in which the neoliberalisation of the public university could be disrupted and dismantled, in order to enable university teachers alongside their students and the university community in general to work towards creating alternative creative pedagogies that are decolonised in pursuit of a public university that is inclusive and humanising.
In conclusion, in this article, I have attempted to do three things. Firstly, I outlined my critique of the South African public university for accepting, emphasising and implementing neoliberal capitalism and its market-orientated fundamentalism in its regimes and discourses. Secondly, I reviewed literature on the lived experiences of existing in and teaching and learning at a neoliberalised public university to draw attention to how such a place can be alienating, dehumanising, exclusionary and marginalising to faculty and their students. Thirdly, I proposed how faculty can transcend neoliberal capitalism in their teaching, as well as colonial and apartheid legacies, by adopting decolonial love as a pedagogical approach. This is because love should always anchor our lives and our relationships with others because the ‘revolutionary possibility of love requires identifying and deconstructing historical alliances between love and reason and between benevolence and imperialism; otherwise, we collaborate with a violent legacy’ (Davis 2002, 146; see also Ureña 2017). This should be viewed as our generational mission if we are all committed to contribute to building a public university that is fulfilling, humanising, meaningful and supportive. In other words, decolonial love as a pedagogical approach can liberate us all from the horrible legacies of colonial and apartheid brutality, as well as from neoliberal violence.
Acknowledgements
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced him in writing this article.
Author’s contributions
P.M. is the sole author of this research article.
Ethical considerations
This study followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.
Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The author is responsible for this study’s results, findings and content.
References
Akala, BM., 2021, ‘A critical reflection on neoliberalism policies and neo-colonialism at African universities’, Journal of Decolonising Disciplines 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.35293/jdd.v3i2.3546
Badat, S., 2011, ‘Free higher education in South Africa why not?’, International Higher Education 63, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2011.63.8535
Boughey, C. & McKenna, S., 2021, Understanding higher education: Alternative perspectives, African Minds, Cape Town.
Brock-Utne, B., 2003, ‘Formulating higher education policies in Africa: The pressure from external forces and the neoliberal agenda’, Journal of Higher Education in Africa 1, 24–56. https://doi.org/10.57054/jhea.v1i1.1689
Brown, W., 2015, Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution, Zone Books, Brooklyn, NY.
Collins, C.S. & Rhoads, R.A., 2010, ‘The World Bank, support for universities, and asymmetrical power relations in international development’, Higher Education 59(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9242-9
Council on Higher Education (CHE), 2000, Size and Shape Task Team: Discussion Document, viewed 19 September 2023, from https://www.dhet.gov.za/Reports%20Doc%20Library/Council%20on%20Higher%20Education%20Size%20and%20Shape%20Task%20Team%20-%20Discussion%20Document.pdf.
Davids, N., 2019, ‘Love in the time of decoloniality’, Alternation Special Edition 24, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2019/sp24.2a5
Davis, D.R., 2002, ‘Love is the ability of not knowing: Feminist experience of the impossible in ethical singularity’, Hypatia 17(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1353/hyp.2002.0031
Department of Education (DoE), 1997, Education White Paper 3: A programme for the transformation of higher education, Department of Education, Pretoria.
De Lissovoy, N., 2010, ‘Decolonial pedagogy and the ethics of the global’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 31(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003786886
Dube, S.I., 2021, ‘The decoloniality of being political studies/science: Legitimising a(nother) way of being’, Critical Studies in Teaching & Learning 9(1), 58–77.
Ford, J., 2023, ‘Breath, sprit, and energy transmission: Womanist praxes to counter coloniality’, in J. Ford & N.E. Jaramillo (eds.), Disrupting colonial pedagogies: Theories & Transgressions, pp. 32–48, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Ford, J. & Jaramillo, N.E., 2023, Disrupting colonial pedagogies: Theories & transgressions, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Freire, P., 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed, Continuum International Publishing Group, New York, NY.
Gräbner, C., 2014, ‘“But how to speak of such things?”: Decolonial love, the coloniality of gender, and political struggle’ in Francisco Goldman’s The Long Night of White Chickens (1992) and Jennifer Harbury’s Bridge of Courage (1994) and Searching for Everardo (1997)’, Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 20(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14701847.2014.965885
Grosfoguel, R., 2007, ‘The epistemic decolonial turn’, Cultural Studies 21(2–3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514
Hahn, N.S., 2007, ‘Neoliberal imperialism and pan-African resistance’, Journal of World-Systems Research 13(2), 142–178. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2007.354
Hlatshwayo, M.N., 2015, ‘Social capital and first-generation South African students at Rhodes University’, Unpublished master’s dissertation, Rhodes University.
Hlatshwayo, M.N., 2022, ‘The rise of the neoliberal university in South Africa: Some implications for curriculum imagination(s)’, Education as Change 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11421
Hlatshwayo, M.N. & Majozi, N.G., 2024, ‘Young, gifted and black: Black early career academics’ experiences in a South African university’, South African Journal of Human Resource Management 22, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2365
Hlatshwayo, M.N. & Ngcobo, B., 2023, ‘“Doing Just Enough to Get By”: Voices of Black women early career academics on navigating the publish or Perish discourse in South Africa’, Education as Change 27(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/13352
Hlatshwayo, M.N., Zondi, T. & Mokoena, T., 2023, ‘It gives me anxiety! Black Academics’ experiences of teaching large classes during the Covid-19 pandemic in a South African university’, Perspectives in Education 41(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i2.6837
Hooks, B., 1994, Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom, Routledge, New York, NY.
Khoza-Shangase, K., 2019, ‘Intellectual and emotional toxicity: Where a cure does not appear to be imminent’, in E.D. Khunou, K. Phaswana, H. Khoza-Shangase & H. Canham (eds.), Black academic voices: The South African experience, pp. 42–64, HSRC Press, Cape Town.
Khunou, G., Phaswana, E.D., Khoza-Shangase, K & Canham, H., 2019, Black academic voices: The South African experience, HSRC Press, Cape Town.
Kiguwa, P., 2019, ‘Negotiating the academy: Black bodies “out of place”’, in P. Khunou, E.D. Phaswana, K. Khoza-Shangase & H. Canham (eds.), Black academic voices: The South African experience, pp. 11–24, HSRC Press, Cape Town.
Koopman, O. & Koopman, K.J., 2021, ‘The impact of the neoliberal technological epoch and COVID-19 on the decolonization of the university curriculum’, South African Journal of Higher Education 35(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-1-4410
Lorde, A., [1984] 2007, Sister outsider: Essays & speeches by Audre Lorde, Crossing Press, Berkeley, CA.
Makhubu, N. & Mbongwa, K., 2019, ‘Radical love as decolonial philosophy: In conversation with Khanyisile Mbongwa’, Journal of Decolonising Disciplines 1(1), 10–26, viewed 19 September 2023, from https://upjournals.up.ac.za/index.php/jdd/article/view/53
Mahabeer, P. & Pirtheepal, T., 2019, ‘Assessment, plagiarism and its effect on academic integrity: Experiences of academics at a university in South Africa’, South African Journal of Science 115(11–12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6323
Maldonado-Torres, N., 2007, ‘On coloniality of being’, Cultural Studies 21(2), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Maldonado-Torres, N., 2008, Against war: Views from the underside of modernity, Duke University Press, Duke.
Maldonado-Torres, N., 2016, Outline of ten theses on coloniality and decoloniality, viewed 19 September 2023, from http://frantzfanonfoundationfondationfrantzfanon.com/article2360.html.
Maluleka, P., 2021a, ‘Teaching in the time of crisis: A decolonial take of my experiences of online teaching at a rural university in South Africa’, African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning 5, 78–94.
Maluleka, P., 2021b, ‘Fallism as decoloniality: Towards a decolonised school history curriculum in post-colonial-apartheid South Africa’, Yesterday and Today 26, 6891. https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2021/n26a4
Maluleka, P., 2023a, ‘Teaching and learning sensitive and controversial topics in history through and with decolonial love’, Yesterday and Today 29(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2023/n29a3
Maluleka, P., 2023b, ‘Towards a decolonized and Africanized school history curriculum in post-apartheid South Africa’, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Wits University.
Mamdani, M., 2007, Scholars in the marketplace. The dilemmas of neo-liberal reform at Makerere University, 1989–2005, CODESRIA, Dakar.
Mignolo, W.D., 2005, The idea of Latin America, Blackwell, Oxford.
Mignolo, W.D., 2007, ‘Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking’, Cultural Studies 21(2–3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498
Naidoo, R., 2010, ‘Global learning in a neoliberal age: Implications for development’, In E. Unterhalter & V. Carpentier (eds.), Global inequalities and higher education: Whose interests are we serving, pp. 66–90, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Ndofirepi, A. & Hungwe, J.P, 2022, ‘A crisis like no other: Disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic in the neoliberal African higher education era’, South African Journal of Higher Education 36(4), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5200
Nkrumah, K., 1966, Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism, International Publishers, New York, NY.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S., 2013, Coloniality of power in postcolonial Africa: Myths of decolonization, African Books Collective, Oxford.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S., 2015, ‘Genealogies of coloniality and implications for Africa’s development’, Africa Development 40(3), 13–40.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S., 2018, Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization, Routledge, London.
Nussbaum, M., 1999, ‘Women and equality: The capabilities approach’, International Labour Review 138(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.1999.tb00386.x
Nyoni, P., 2024, ‘Embracing plural curricula amid neoliberalism in contemporary universities in Africa: Asante’s Afrocentric idea revisited’, The Thinker 99(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.36615/26a6d747
Peet, R., 2002, ‘Ideology, discourse, and the geography of hegemony: From socialist to neoliberal development in post-apartheid South Africa’, Antipode 34(1), 54–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00226
Quijano, A., [1989] 2000, ‘Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’, International Sociology 15(2), 215–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Rodney, W., 1972, How Europe underdeveloped Africa, Tanzania Publishing House, Dar es Salaam.
Sandoval, C., 2000, Methodology of the oppressed, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Saunders, D.B., 2015, ‘Resisting excellence: Challenging neoliberal ideology in postsecondary education’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 13(2), 391–413, viewed 19 September 2023, from http://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/13-13-2-13.pdf
Sen, A., 1993, ‘Capability and well-being’, in M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (eds.), The quality of life, pp. 188–230, Oxford Clarendon Press, New York, NY.
Shore, C., 2010, ‘Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the Schizophrenic University’, Social Anthropology 18(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00094.x
Snyder, H., 2019, ‘Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines’, Journal of Business Research 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Ureña, C., 2017, ‘Loving from below: Of (de)colonial love and other demons’, Hypatia 32(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12302
Walsh, C.E., 2016, Rising up, living on: Re-existences, sowings, and decolonial cracks, Duke University Press, Duke.
Ward, S.C., 2012, Neoliberalism and the global restructuring of knowledge and education, Routledge, London.
Wynter, S., 2003, ‘Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation-an argument’, The New Centennial Review 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
Zulu, N.T., 2021, ‘The struggles and the triumphs of South African Black Women Professors’, South African Journal of Higher Education 35(6), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-6-4272
Footnote
1. This thinking, without italics, is derived from a talk that was presented by Dr Sarah Godsell at the “Building Communities of Researchers in the Curriculum and Social Studies Division” Seminar Series hosted by the Curriculum and Social Studies Division, Wits School of Education – University of the Witwatersrand, 24 May 2024.
|
Hide
Show all
Email this article (Login required)
