Abstract
Working from the lens of professional identity, the article explores transformation in higher education by considering the vital role of professional associations, specifically the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology (SIOPSA). We contend that, due to the historical and spatial dynamics of apartheid and its legacies, many professional fields in South Africa have been shaped and maintained as predominantly White spaces. For this reason, professional associations, such as SIOPSA, struggle to transform. Adopting an interpretive approach, we employ a documentary case study to examine the challenges Black industrial and organisational psychologists (BIOPs) face in developing their professional identities. While we set the context from 2009, our article focuses on interventions between 2020 and 2024. We suggest three primary identity-related factors that hinder professional identity development: embodied practices, material and institutional arrangements, and group relations and capital. Thereafter, we consider interventions that have been developed to address these challenges, highlighting their relationship with each of the identity-related contributing factors. We argue that meaningful transformation in the professions requires reimagining Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives through the lens of identity and power – acknowledging diverse presences, dismantling structural barriers, and fostering psychologically and relationally safe spaces.
Contribution: This article is outlining interventions to ensure comprehensive transformation in professional spaces.
Keywords: transformation; white spaces; professional associations; psychology; DEI.
Introduction
Being human is not a given but a political potentiality which manifests on an oppression-liberation continuum of enacted harmful negations and salutogenic affirmations of our humanity. (Kronenberg 2018)
Historically, professions and their associations in South Africa have been constructed as primarily white spaces (Crafford 2022), taking on the qualities of the bodies that historically habitually inhabited them (Ahmed 2007). This has made it particularly challenging for aspiring black professionals to develop a coherent and positive professional identity (Crafford 2022; Roberts & Creary 2012; Slay & Smith 2011). Professional identity refers to ‘an individual’s self-definition as a member of a profession and is associated with the enactment of a professional role’ (Chreim, Williams & Hinings 2007:1515). Professional identities are developed in and through social interactions, comprising the layering of multiple interactions in professional settings (Pratt, Rockmann & Kaufmann 2006). It is thus inherently relational, and professional associations are a crucial context in which developing identities are formed and shaped. However, these often manifest in professional environments in the form of racism and historical white privilege (Crafford 2022). For black professionals, being recognised as fully human, both socially and professionally, is not a given. As Kronenberg (2018) argues, it is a political potentiality that must be enacted rather than assumed. In identity terms, this potentiality expresses itself as identity work, the agency people have in choosing and negotiating their identities in the face of external constraints (Saayman & Crafford 2011). Yet as Ahmed (2007:153) has argued, agency is not guaranteed and is dependent on spaces being available for agentic expression, thus holding or withholding the potential for action. For many black South Africans, navigating historically white professional spaces means negotiating harmful negations in the pursuit of positive identity validation. These negations result not only from structural factors such as legislation and organisational policies, but also from relational harm, including mistrust, microaggressions, and power imbalances (Crafford 2022).
Professional identity development requires socialisation into the practices, skills and norms of the profession, which often implies the simultaneous reproduction of racialised systems of control (Van Ausdale & Feagin 2001). Consequently, socialisation into the profession through educational institutions and professional associations provides potential threats (Pratt et al. 2006) to the identity development of black professionals. When organisations neglect inclusion, they reinforce exclusionary norms, hindering black professionals from integrating their identities and thriving. These spaces are not neutral – they promote inclusion or entrench exclusion, shaping future leaders who drive systemic change. This is clearly illustrated by our case study of the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA). The SIOPSA is a voluntary member-based, non-profit association that aims to promote and support the industrial and organisational (I/O) psychology profession in South Africa. During 2020, within SIOPSA structures, a virtual focus group with intern IOPs highlighted the challenges faced by Black Industrial and Organisational Psychologists (BIOPs), specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic, and drew attention to the continued systemic inequities that disproportionately disadvantaged them. The pandemic exacerbated existing barriers, making professional progression increasingly difficult for many black master’s students in IOP. This provided a much-needed wake-up call to the failure of existing professional structures to adequately support BIOPs, ultimately reinforcing their exclusion from key developmental and leadership opportunities, thus jeopardising their development as professionals.
In response, an Open Space dialogue was convened with 30 senior BIOPs later in 2020 to explore strategies for fostering a more diverse and inclusive profession in South Africa. A key outcome of the discussion was the establishment of a structured network to engage BIOPs, amplify their voices, and advocate for systemic change. These efforts have had a modest response, with BIOP representation within SIOPSA increasing by only 2.1 percentage points (from 29.6% to 31.7%) from 2020 to 2024, an average annual growth rate of approximately 0.525. Given that black South Africans (i.e., black African, Coloured and Indian ethnic groups) constitute 92.5% of the economically active population (25th Commission for Employment Equity 2024/25), these statistics raise vital questions: What prevents change? Who holds the power to ensure it takes place? Who benefits from the current transformation-related policies? Who has access to influence and decision-making? How to bring about significant change?
This article analyses SIOPSA’s efforts to support transformation in the I/O psychology profession in South Africa. In doing so, it discusses measures taken, offers insights into key challenges, highlights lessons learned, and explores opportunities for transforming professional spaces. We structure the article as follows. We begin by considering professional associations and their role in developing professional identity through further education and professional socialisation. Thereafter, we will briefly outline the development of the profession of psychology as a white space, explicitly considering its history. We trace the transformation journey in our professional association, SIOPSA, highlighting challenges, discussing interventions adopted and exploring learning opportunities. We evaluate these in light of accepted Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) practices, focusing on their ability to achieve transformation in white spaces. We argue that meaningful transformation in professions can only be achieved by reimagining DEI initiatives through a lens that considers identity and power. While we set the context from 2009, our article focuses on interventions between 2020 and 2024, during which the authors were involved in transformation efforts in SIOPSA.
Professional associations and Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa
A professional association is ‘an organization of practitioners who judge one another as professionally competent and who have banded together to perform social functions which they cannot perform in their capacity as individuals’ (Merton 1958:50). These are typically voluntary and work to set rigorous standards for the profession and enforce these, promote the competence of professionals by raising the standard of education, support individual practitioners and act as custodians of professional tradition (Merton 1958). As such, professional associations play an integral role in shaping professional norms and culture, and in how these are sustained through processes of socialisation. Examples of professional associations in South Africa include the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA), the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) and the SIOPSA.
As indicated, SIOPSA is the professional association dedicated to the promotion of the profession of I/O psychology in South Africa. To create some context for the reader, I/O psychology is defined by Schreuder and Coetzee (2010) as ‘an academic and an applied field concerned with the study of human behaviour related to work, organisations and productivity in a particular type of location, that is, almost any kind of organisation’ (p. 1). In South Africa, the profession is regulated by statute, and registration with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) is mandatory and governed by adherence to strict guidelines (Padmanabhanunni et al. 2022). These include obtaining the required master’s qualifications from universities offering programmes accredited by the HPCSA and completing an approved 12-month internship (Van Niekerk, Oosthuizen & Coetzee 2024). After completing the internship, candidates must pass a mandatory board exam to register as I/O psychologists with the HPCSA. This registration is maintained through ongoing professional development (Van Niekerk et al. 2024). In contrast to the HPCSA, SIOPSA is a voluntary association in support of the profession, with members at various stages of their careers. Appointments to SIOPSA’s leadership structures are regulated by its Constitution, which delineates a transparent and member-driven process. Eligible members may be nominated either by themselves or by their fellow members and subsequently elected through a formal voting process administered by the Society. The presidential succession adheres to a constitutionally mandated 3-year cycle, encompassing the roles of President-Elect, President and Past President. Leadership positions within both the Executive Committee and the Management Committee are appointed similarly through nominations and elections conducted by the membership. This structured approach ensures consistent leadership renewal, stability in governance and the advancement of SIOPSA’s strategic objectives. Over time, this system has facilitated the Society’s endeavours to foster a distinctive and evolving professional identity for industrial and organisational psychology in South Africa.
The history of professional psychology in South Africa
The history of psychology in South Africa, and its close links with racism and oppression, is well documented (Cooper & Nicholas 2012), with a close connection between history (temporality) and space (spatiality) (Al Ariss et al. 2014). Consequently, one must consider the profession’s history in light of the influence of colonialism and apartheid. Two former heads of state had close ties with psychology as an academic discipline: Jan Smuts and Hendrick Verwoerd, the architect of apartheid (Cooper & Nicholas 2012). Psychology, with its focus on the individual as its object of study, has been particularly vulnerable to the influence of racist ideologies shaping the discipline’s foundational perspectives. The South African Psychological Association (SAPA) was established in 1948, and while not explicitly preventing black membership, rejected Josephine Naidoo’s membership application in 1957 (Naidoo 2018). In 1962, when black members were accepted, a group of conservative psychologists broke away in protest (Foster 1993). When the first black psychologist, N. Chabani Manganyi, tried to obtain an internship, he could find no established programmes for black psychologists (Manganyi 2013). Fortunately, he found a neurosurgery professor willing to accommodate him, and he finally completed his internship at the end of 1969 (Manganyi 2013). During his internship, however, he was subject to the usual apartheid-like segregation practices, meaning separate places of residence, eating facilities and ablutions for whites and blacks, with salary scales based on racial and ethnic criteria (Manganyi 2013). Despite Manganyi’s stature as a psychologist, scholar, and author, his first book, Being-Black-in-the-World (1973), remained largely unknown in South Africa. In 1994, unity among psychology associations was achieved when they merged at the University of the Western Cape to form the Psychological Society of South Africa (PsySSA) (Nicholas 2014). From this body, the then-Society for Industrial Psychology (SIP), a division of PsySSA, disengaged in 2006.
Developing black industrial and organisational psychologists identity in Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa
Against this historical backdrop, the development of BIOP identity in the I/O psychology profession must be considered in relation to how physical and mental spaces have historically worked together to reinforce the notion of a ‘white’ profession (Elden 2007:111). Given that professional identity construction is closely entwined with various elements of personal and professional life (Lloyd, Roodt & Odendaal 2011), BIOPs are inevitably faced with the realities of white spaces and the challenges they pose. The following list outlines primary ways to develop identity (Alvesson, Ashcraft & Thomas 2008) and demonstrates how professional practices and spaces are implicated:
- Embodied practices refer to what people do at work (Barley & Kunda 2001). For an aspiring professional, it is essential to be allowed to engage in and learn core professional practices (Billett & Somerville 2004; Ruohotie-Lyhty 2013; Trede 2012), especially because professional identity is defined by ‘what one does’ (Lepisto, Crosina & Pratt 2015).
- Material and institutional arrangements refer to how professions are structured and include elements such as the division of labour, hierarchies in the profession that manifest in job titles and descriptions, reporting structures, salaries and spatial privileges.
- Social relationships and capitals refer to the social interactions central to developing professional identity, for example, professional relationships (Billett & Somerville 2004; Wald 2015), role models (Goldie 2012), mentoring (Devos 2010) and peer learning (Trede 2012). These are central to developing reflective practices necessary for skill development (Trede 2012; Wald 2015).
Given the close association between professional identity construction and the spaces within which these occur, we argue that white bodies have, over an extended period, become implicitly designated as being the ‘natural occupants’ of professional spaces (Puwar 2004:8). Because of this, BIOPs may struggle to achieve certification and recognition in professional spaces, not because of their intrinsic capacity but rather because of how professional spaces are made available to them as a space for action (Ahmed 2007:153).
Research methods and design
Working from an interpretive perspective, we employed a primarily document-based case study of the professional association that supports I/O psychology in South Africa, SIOPSA. Although case studies are not typically associated with analysing only textual data, there is precedent for this approach in identity research. For example, Coupland and Brown (2004) used internet-based email exchanges to explore organisational identity in the case of Royal Dutch Shell. According to Wood, Sebar and Vecchio (2020), discourse analysis is one possible approach to document analysis. Nevertheless, in line with the more traditional aims of case study research, namely understanding a case in context, we have located our insights in the history of psychology in South Africa (Klarin & Sharmelly 2019), this being a pertinent factor in making sense of the data.
Data gathering
Transforming professional associations demands thoughtful reflection and a willingness to face institutional challenges. Within this framework, organisational documents created by SIOPSA between 2009 and 2024 were considered the most pragmatic means for identifying systemic obstacles and reflecting the solutions constructed in response. Two types of documents were drawn on. Firstly, we drew on internal reports relevant to the events in 2020, which triggered the intense reflection around transformation. These sources provided a comprehensive perspective on the challenges and opportunities that BIOPs encounter in their internship experiences and professional identity formation. Secondly, we drew on external, publicly available annual reports to create a context for the events under scrutiny. We will describe each of these in more detail.
The internal documents generated after the events of 2020 included the following:
- Navigating a Tailored Internship in Lockdown Report: A virtual focus group series engaged 94 IOP interns and 14 supervisors on adapting internships, regulatory challenges and professional socialisation during COVID-19. Post-session surveys provided insights (SIOPSA 2020). The facilitators identified specific challenges faced by BIOPs within both SIOPSA and the broader profession.
- SIOPSA BIOP Caucus Focus Group Report: This process involved 70 BIOPs (interns, early-career professionals and senior practitioners) and explored issues of identity, systemic racism, mentorship gaps and career advancement barriers. Discussions were transcribed, coded and thematically analysed (SIOPSA 2021a).
- The BIOP Caucus Concept Presentation: This report outlines the caucus’s goals within SIOPSA and a 3-year plan for improving representation, promoting equity and creating career pathways (SIOPSA 2021b).
- Comparison analysis of the HPCSA racial breakdown of IOPs (2020–2024): This analysis shows trends in racial representation. Data reveal slow progress in BIOP representation, with ongoing challenges in mobility and retention (Kock 2024).
To provide context and develop a timeline for the transformation efforts discussed in the article, we also drew on external reports and, more specifically, annual reports and conference programmes from 2009 to 2024. Company documents and annual reports in particular are a well-justified source of studying identity and are often used to track shifts therein (Chreim 2005). SIOPSA’s annual reports, authored by multiple contributors, serve as a valuable resource for examining collectively held and socially constructed meanings (Corley et al. 2006) Moreover, these accounts are produced by members in positions of influence and are thus likely to represent the dominant views (Brown 2006).
Data analysis
To analyse the data, we used qualitative document analysis (QDA), which is often used in case study research (Wood et al. 2020). Qualitative document analysis provides a means of extracting meaning from organisational and institutional documents (Bowen 2009). Although QDA is usually used alongside interviews and observations, ethical concerns in this study (Morgan 2021) necessitated reliance on documents as the primary source of ‘social facts’ (Atkinson & Coffey 1997:47) to ground the analysis. Following Gorichanaz and Latham (2016), we utilised a framework of ‘document experience’, which implies a relationship of meaning generation by the researcher based on the documents analysed (p. 1118). All authors participated in analysing the data, and the documents were systematically reviewed to identify key trends and themes. The authors spent time discussing the findings, and in the process realised that these could be clustered in alignment with the sources of professional identity development as discussed in the literature review. We validated these themes against the data and reached consensus on them as final themes.
While the findings are grounded in the document analysis, given all the authors’ involvement in SIOPSA, our experiences have inevitably shaped and shed light on these interpretations. We are all committed to transformation and have driven initiatives within the professional setting under study. It is, therefore, imperative to acknowledge that the resulting analysis is attributable to the documentary evidence and our reflexive processes, and the resulting narrative is an attempt to inform and persuade (McAdams 1996). This does not mean we do not take quality seriously, and to enhance the authenticity and credibility of our findings, we have sought to provide, within space constraints, a detailed description of the case and its historical context (Miles & Huberman 1994).
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the University of Pretoria, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences (EMS326/24), subject to permission from the case organisation (SIOPSA), which was secured. These permission letters are available on request.
Results
The challenges of black industrial and organisational psychologists constructing professional identity in white spaces
This section reports on the findings of the document analysis. We begin by sketching the history of transformation in SIOPSA to provide a context for understanding the themes that were constructed. Thereafter, we present the findings of the internal report analysis which produced three themes: embodied practices and professional identity, material and institutional arrangements, and social relationships and capitals that constrain the professional identity development of BIOPs in South Africa.
Setting the context for transformation in Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa (2009–2019)
An analysis of SIOPSA annual reports from 2009 onwards documented transformation efforts under each presidency. While the 2010 annual report1 mentions the need for SIOPSA to take heed of transformation and align with society, the focus was on social upliftment in disadvantaged areas. In 2013, transformation was once again only mentioned in relation to social responsibility projects. In 2014, there was a more straightforward strategy for transforming SIOPSA by recruiting and including students and interns representing all facets of South African society. Further transformation engagement was documented in the 2015 annual report, in which transformation was positioned as a strategic imperative. A transformation sub-committee was established, and a transformation portfolio was included in the SIOPSA management committee, locating transformation at the highest decision-making level in the association. The aim was to increase the number of BIOPs, support academia to increase black IO psychology graduates, offer bursaries for previously disadvantaged master’s students, and support their internship efforts. In 2017, the annual SIOPSA conference included transformation-related content, such as workshops, keynote addresses, research papers and panel discussions.
The overview indicates some progress towards transformation, particularly in increasing the representation of BIOPs to better reflect South African society. The SIOPSA leadership, in various annual reports, had repeatedly expressed the fear of redundancy of the profession should transformation be ignored. Although the SIOPSA transformation strategy was documented in some annual reports, the reported activities suggest inconsistent implementation and success. It is against this backdrop that the results of the internal document analysis should be understood.
Embodied practice and professional identity
The data indicated that BIOPs often face challenges regarding professional development because of exclusionary practices, which appeared to be rooted in the undervaluation of African-centred knowledge and their embodiment as black South Africans. Many BIOPs experience hypervisibility, scrutiny and alienation in their work environments. The emotional toll includes exhaustion, anxiety and a suppression of identity, illustrating the profound effects of exclusion. When individuals have to hide their authentic selves to be seen as legitimate, their professional identity development tends to be driven more by survival than self-actualisation.
This often results in BIOPs being steered toward HR functions rather than core psychological roles that define the IOP profession, as reflected in one participant’s statement:
[… A]s soon as it’s a black IOP, they kind of shove you towards being the HR person … (SIOPSA 2021a:16)
I feel like I’m doing HR, not psychology. IOPs should be solving workplace issues, but we’re given compliance admin work. (SIOPSA 2020:9)
While this may appear insignificant to a casual observer, it takes on critical importance when viewed through the lens of SIOPSA’s collective identity. In 2006, having disengaged from PsySSA (as discussed earlier), SIOPSA was primarily concerned with establishing its uniqueness as an independent professional body with a distinct identity. Part of this process was constructing a distinct professional identity for IOPs, which is often conflated with the practice of HR management. Given that professions are defined by what they do (Pratt et al. 2006), directing BIOPs to the practices of HR invalidates their professional identity claims (DeRue & Ashford 2010) as IOPs. Consequently, the professional misalignment hampers their competency development and career satisfaction (SIOPSA 2021a).
Even when BIOPs met all the requirements, they felt they were expected to exert more effort to prove themselves:
Even after registering, I still felt like I had to prove my worth, unlike my white colleagues. (SIOPSA 2021a:24)
Many are assigned lower-value work, are overlooked for promotions, or are perceived as not yet ready for leadership. The professional culture in IOP continues to privilege specific ways of speaking, networking and presenting, making it more challenging for BIOPs to build credibility within established circles. Despite these challenges, BIOPs have shown resilience by advocating for structural reforms within professional associations like SIOPSA (2021a). For instance, the interns believed that the lockdown fostered their internal resilience, compelling them to take ownership of their circumstances and adapt to the challenges of uncertain territory (SIOPSA 2020, 2021:15).
Material and institutional arrangements
Professional identity development relies on opportunities to engage in activities that define the profession and lead to registration as an IOP; without these, one cannot practise or market oneself as an IOP. An IOP internship is pivotal in developing professional identity by providing space for practical workplace exposure, developing relevant skills, observing leadership examples and opportunities for mentorship. Yet a review of the documentary evidence suggested that this crucial milestone of professional development remains a challenge for BIOPs:
Students that had not secured an internship, a year after finishing the master’s, were black students. So that also sends us a loud message: What is wrong in the system? (SIOPSA 2021a:9)
The COVID-19 pandemic further disrupted these educational pathways, depriving interns of in-person experiences and further marginalising BIOPs from vital professional development opportunities (SIOPSA 2020). Without access to real-world experiences, many interns – especially BIOPs – felt detached from their evolving professional identity and struggled to transition from academia to the workforce (SIOPSA 2021).
The HPCSA, the regulatory body overseeing the profession, plays a vital role in managing IOP internships discussed above. Participants suggest that the HPCSA often acts as a gatekeeper, controlling entry into the profession. Many interns encounter unclear registration processes, delayed processing of internship approvals, high registration costs and inconsistent supervision requirements, making it unnecessarily difficult to complete this important milestone of their professional development (SIOPSA 2020):
Dealing with the HPCSA has been my biggest headache, because there’s one lady that’s in charge of internships. (SIOPSA 2021a:11)
Thus, the very mechanisms set up to develop and shape professional identity often work to hinder BIOPs in their journey. Simply put, without the HPCSA that holds the regulatory power, an aspirant IOP cannot be professionally registered in South Africa. While SIOPSA cannot take responsibility for the shortcomings of the HPCSA’s internship management, as the custodians of the IOP profession, it is incumbent on its leadership and members to facilitate the professional identity development of its younger members.
An additional institutional barrier is the mismatch between the number of IOP graduates and the limited availability of accredited internship placements. Higher education institutions enrol more IOP students than corporate organisations can accommodate for internships, largely due to financial constraints. This misalignment creates a bottleneck in professional training, leaving graduates to find internships independently, which are required for registration. Consequently, many graduates experience prolonged unemployment, hindering their career progression and the development of a more diverse IOP profession.
This issue is particularly severe for BIOPs, as access to internships often depends on social capital and professional networks. Black graduates struggle to secure structured internship programmes in registered host organisations, especially those whose parents lack connections in large corporations. These graduates must often create tailored internship programmes and source their host organisations and supervisors. The lack of connections exacerbates systemic inequities, hindering BIOPs’ successful transition from education to practice.
The financial burden of accessing the profession remains a key barrier, as highlighted by participants in recent research:
The high cost of completing IOP studies, internships, and gaining accreditation prevents many of us from moving forward. (SIOPSA 2021a:11)
This challenge is further compounded by economic uncertainty, as another participant noticed:
[… T]he cost of an internship at this stage, when economic wellbeing becomes a greater concern and job security is questioned, was a significant point. (SIOPSA 2020:14)
Beyond bureaucratic barriers, the material circumstances of students and graduates added another layer of potential exclusion. The costs of internships, registration fees and poorly paid training opportunities disproportionately impact BIOPs, who often lack financial support. These economic barriers hinder their transition into full-time professional roles (Kock 2024).
Social relations and capital
In many professions, who you know matters as much as what you know. Social relationships and networks, and the capitals that derive from these, play a key role in professional identity development and career advancement. The IOP profession in South Africa is small, and its networks are relatively tight. Given the slow pace of transformation in the profession (Crafford 2022) and ongoing underrepresentation, BIOPs reported exclusion from informal professional spaces and limited access to networks, sponsors, and role models who offer mentorship:
To get the work is really reliant on previous referrals, you know, your ability to have navigated in the market before. But without that, you’re coming in cold. (SIOPSA 2021a:12)
If you don’t have connections, you won’t get ahead in this field. (SIOPSA 2021a:18)
Black industrial and organisational psychologists enter a profession where the informal ‘rules of engagement’ – how one speaks, dresses and networks – are dictated by historically privileged groups. They suggested that white IOPs benefit from informal referrals, networking experiences and structured mentorship, which often remain unavailable to BIOPs (SIOPSA 2021a). While white counterparts benefit from established professional networks, BIOPs often lack advocates to support their career progression:
[… A] less experienced white IOP would have more access than myself almost 30 years in the field. And so, I found that quite disturbing. (SIOPSA 2021a:13)
White interns already have a network – they get recommended for roles. We have to fight for everything. (SIOPSA 2021a:20)
Role models are an integral part of professional development, as they provide opportunities to experiment with provisional identities and evaluate these against external feedback from a trusted source (Goldie 2012). As such, they play a crucial role in developing emerging professionals. A mentor with similar life experiences who understands the challenges faced by emerging BIOPs fosters greater trust and openness in the mentorship process. Trusted mentors who can advocate for their mentees in decision-making spaces play a critical role in career advancement:
We are struggling to get role models in higher education. Very few black professional academics. (SIOPSA 2021a:12)
In addition to their exclusion from social networks and their associated capitals, BIOPs reported experiencing racial microaggressions, unequal treatment and exclusion from significant professional spaces, which were often perceived as white. Many felt scrutinised or undervalued, and their professional contributions were often questioned (Kock 2024):
This is the first SIOPSA conference that was virtual. I enjoyed it so much better. I didn’t feel that exclusion. At the conferences in Pretoria, it was such a ‘white boys’ club. (SIOPSA 2021a:13)
At industry conferences, I felt like an imposter. It’s a ‘white boys’ club. (SIOPSA 2021a:22)
Interventions developed by Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa to promote transformation
While SIOPSA acknowledges the existence of multiple marginalised identities within the IOP profession, including those related to gender, disability and socio-economic background, in light of South Africa’s historical and socio-political context, race remains the most significant axis of exclusion (Crafford 2022). Consequently, SIOPSA’s transformation efforts have prioritised race as a focal point, recognising that addressing racial inequities lays the groundwork for broader inclusion initiatives. Based on the data gathered and expertise within the SIOPSA cohort, various initiatives were developed, focussed on three levels:
Level 1: Strategic foundation
These are high-level vision and policy frameworks that articulate the long-term direction, goals and priorities of transformation within SIOPSA. They provide the philosophical and structural basis for inclusion, equity and professional development within the association with the purpose of setting clear transformation objectives, guiding institutional commitment and ensuring alignment with national equity targets.
Level 2: Governance structures
These refer to the formal institutional mechanisms that enable and operationalise transformation strategy. These include portfolios, roles and governance arrangements that institutionalise diversity, equity and inclusion within decision-making bodies. The purpose of these mechanisms is to embed transformation within leadership and ensure accountability, continuity and resourcing for DEI efforts.
Level 3: Programme implementation
This refers to the tangible interventions and capacity-building initiatives designed to address systemic barriers and advance the skills, access and professional identity of marginalised groups. The purpose is to drive change through targeted actions such as mentorship, internships, training and advocacy platforms that improve representation and equity outcomes.
Table 1 delineates the three levels with their key initiatives, characteristics and immediate transformative impact on SIOPSA, illustrating how intentional and data-driven DEI strategies can positively reshape the profession.
| TABLE 1: Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa best practices for transformation. |
From strategy to lived experience: Integrating best practices with identity-shaping mechanisms
The initiatives outlined in Table 1 represent a structured response to the persistent barriers BIOPs face. Yet, to fully understand their impact, we must examine how these interventions address the lived realities of BIOPs through three interdependent lenses: embodied practices, material and institutional arrangements and group relations and/or social capital.
Embodied practices
In the context of BIOPs, embodied practices refer to how professional identity is shaped and expressed. Initiatives such as the Internship Management Programme and Capability Building Workshops directly tackle these dimensions of professional identity. By expanding access to meaningful work, supervised practice and public recognition, these interventions enable BIOPs to build legitimacy through exposure and skill development. They help to counter the constant scrutiny and being overlooked that BIOPs frequently navigate in predominantly white professional spaces.
Moreover, these efforts create space for authentic identity expression, allowing BIOPs to participate in professional settings without shedding core aspects of their cultural and personal identity. Campaigns such as #iBelong provide psychological validation and challenge narrow norms of professionalism that equate competence with conformity. As highlighted in the embodied DEI critique, transformation requires rethinking whose bodies are welcomed, affirmed and legitimised within professional environments, not just who is present.
Material and institutional arrangements
SIOPSA’s Transformation Strategy 1.0 and 2.0, the creation of dedicated governance portfolios, and programmes such as the Internship Management Programme reflect a clear effort to reshape the institutional landscape. These initiatives have laid the foundation for shifting decision-making, resourcing and accountability in ways that support sustainable inclusion. Paid internships, for example, disrupt historical patterns where only the economically privileged are able to complete professional training.
However, data from recent years still reflect pipeline bottlenecks, with many graduates waiting years to secure internships. The demand for structured internship placements continues to outpace supply, leaving graduates from 2024 still unplaced, alongside those who will complete their internships in 2025 and those expected to finish in 2026. This backlog points to the ongoing misalignment between university enrolments and professional placement capacity. It also exposes broader systemic barriers such as professional registration complexities, racialised gatekeeping in supervisory roles and uneven access to mentorship. The HPCSA Professional Board’s introduction of a degree-linked internship model in 2027 is expected to alleviate some of these pressures; however, immediate solutions are required to address the current gaps in internship accessibility.
The equity critique, a key aspect of our analysis, underlines that transformation efforts will remain largely symbolic unless these material structures are reimagined. Policies must target the redistribution of opportunity, power and resources and establish measurable outcomes tied to equity goals.
Social relationships and capitals
The formation of the BIOP Caucus, the rollout of a structured mentorship programme and community campaigns such as #oneSIOPSA are crucial interventions in fostering professional belonging and advancing social capital. These initiatives connect BIOPs with peers, role models and sponsors who can guide them, advocate for them and support their long-term leadership development.
Mentorship has proven especially valuable in mitigating isolation and imposter syndrome while also opening professional networks often inaccessible to BIOPs. These spaces foster collective identity and relational safety, countering the psychological toll of exclusion and microaggressions.
The broader inclusion critique emphasises that inclusion must move beyond performative gestures to embed relational justice. Relational justice, in this context, refers to a system where BIOPs are not merely accommodated but seen as central to the profession’s evolution.
Beyond Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa: white spaces and professional transformation
Our case study reinforces the assertion that representation and transformation do not occur naturally but require deliberate and sustained efforts. Representation does not transform itself. Our findings affirm that transformation must confront the spatial, embodied and relational logics of exclusion. White spaces within the profession do not change simply by inserting new bodies. They must be restructured to accommodate multiple ways of being, knowing, and leading.
We contend that transformation efforts, often disguised as DEI practices, are insufficient as they frequently neglect the significant role embodiment plays in perpetuating the influence of white spaces. This acknowledgement is essential to tackle the deeper structural forces that limit professional and institutional access. Therefore, to foster meaningful transformation, we must reconceptualise DEI to recognise the crucial role of embodiment and its connection to space.
Reimagining diversity, equity and inclusion through identity and power
Too often, DEI is reduced to metrics of how diverse a space is. However, the deeper transformation work involves interrogating how norms are enforced, how power circulates and how identity is allowed to flourish. BIOPS must not only be invited to the table but also help redesign it, ensuring that space is inclusive and transformative.
Embodied experiences, structural access and relational legitimacy should interweave in the professional journey. SIOPSA’s progress, while commendable, illustrates the limits of traditional DEI and the promise of a more identity-conscious, justice-driven approach.
Acknowledging presence in white spaces
While the diversity component of DEI focuses on visible diversity metrics (race, gender and disability), it neglects how bodies are regulated in space. It often ignores the policing BIOP bodies experience in white professional spaces and the expectations placed on them to conform. Research suggests that racialised bodies are subject to implicit biases that dictate professional norms, often reinforcing exclusionary environments (Roberts & Caza 2025). Embodied professional identity – how one dresses, speaks, moves and takes up space – is a critical but often overlooked component of professional legitimacy that must be addressed to transform truly.
To rectify this, policies must explicitly address cultural and embodied norms that dictate who is considered professional and competent. This implies challenging the bases for assimilation, and instead of expecting black professionals to conform, workspaces should allow for multiple cultural expressions of professionalism. To create room for authentic self-expression, we should cultivate a deeper understanding of how identity is performed and restricted in everyday professional spaces (Martinez et al. 2017). Embodied storytelling and reflection can be helpful in this regard. Finally, because black professionals experience either invisibility or hypervisibility, DEI interventions should design conditions for them to be seen in ways that acknowledge but do not accentuate their embodiment within spaces of power.
Removing structural barriers
The equity component of DEI is the most challenging dimension to address, especially in South Africa. Despite substantial investment in diversity and inclusion initiatives, these often appear performative and rarely lead to a meaningful redesign in institutional structures to ensure sustainable equity. As such, they fail to improve economic access, ownership and opportunities. Until decision-making power is genuinely redistributed to the marginalised majority who work in white spaces, DEI efforts will remain symbolic rather than transformative.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion efforts should move beyond recruitment quotas to address financial and material barriers aspiring professionals face through scholarships and paid internships. Given the many hurdles black professionals face, serious reconsideration should be given to redesigning industry accreditation and training models. Moreover, attempts at gatekeeping in licensing, supervision and qualification processes must be identified and dismantled to create equitable pathways for professional advancement. Finally, equity targets should be clear, and leadership in professional associations should take active responsibility for measurable equity outcomes.
Creating psychological and relational safety
Positive and coherent identity development rests on the twin pillars of belonging and distinctiveness (Brewer 2003). As suggested above, professionals should be able to express themselves comfortably in a manner consistent with their embodied identity but, in the same space, experience a feeling of belonging characterised by psychological and relational safety. Many transformation initiatives do not consider how power, hierarchy and relational dynamics impact who feels safe, heard and valued (Brown et al. 2010). For this reason, belonging should also imply structural inclusion.
To ensure that BIOPs experience structural inclusion, systemic changes should be made in how leaders are selected, teams are comprised and cultural expression is permitted. Many black professionals in South Africa carry relational and generational trauma as a consequence of our troubled history (Crafford 2022; Lloyd et al. 2011). This is in addition to the workplace trauma resulting from exclusion, microaggressions and discrimination. DEI frameworks should incorporate healing spaces, dialogue circles and restorative practices to address these harms (Creary 2025). Finally, inclusion implies challenging traditional leadership norms, as these create spaces where professionals work. Traditional leadership models should be re-evaluated in the light of alternative leadership styles, decision-making frameworks and team structures.
Moving forward: A model of transformation for South Africa
Kronenberg’s (2018) provocation with which this article commenced compels us to rethink transformation as a fundamentally humanising project – one that actively resists dehumanising structures while cultivating spaces where people’s full humanity can be affirmed, expressed and realised. South Africa’s historical context requires a transformation model that recognises change not as a passive unfolding over time but as the outcomes of intentional, radical, justice-oriented intervention. Current DEI efforts fall short because they ignore the embodied, affective and political effects of white institutional spaces – spaces, which persist largely unchallenged. This is arguably because they were never designed to change the nature of white spaces but rather shape black professionals in their image and reward them for their compliance in doing so.2 Meaningful transformation requires more than inclusion; it demands the redistribution of power, resources and influence, and the centring of marginalised professionals not only as participants but also as leaders and shapers of the institutional futures.
To realise this, transformation must confront the enduring structures that constrain the professional potential of black South Africans and reframe DEI as a radical reassertion of dignity, belonging and personhood. If DEI is to be more than a corporate trend, it must involve confronting the politics of embodiment, interrogating institutional power and disrupting the normative logics that determine who is seen as legitimate, capable and worthy. Metrics of transformation must therefore evolve – from merely representational presence to assessing how those historically marginalised are shaping, leading and transforming professional fields. Transformation will not occur through symbolic gestures; it requires a redesign of the systems that construct and constrain professional legitimacy, access and leadership. The next phase of transformation in South Africa must be bold, intersectional and unapologetically committed to a humanising praxis – one that fosters relational healing and that changes the rules of who belongs, who leads and, ultimately, who gets to define the future.
Acknowledgements
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article
Authors’ contributions
A.C., S.A.M., and R.G.K all contributed equally to the conceptualisation, writing, and editing of the manuscript and share first authorship. All authors contributed to the article, discussed the results, and approved the final version for submission and publication.
Funding information
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the third author, R.G.K., upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.
References
Ahmed, S., 2007, ‘A phenomenology of whiteness’, Feminist Theory 8(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107078139
Al Ariss, A., Özbilgin, M., Tatli, A. & April, K., 2014, ‘Tackling whiteness in organizations and management’, Journal of Managerial Psychology 29(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2013-0331
Alvesson, M., Ashcraft, K.L., & Thomas, R., 2008, ‘Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies’, Organization 15(5), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084426
Atkinson, P.A. & Coffey, A., 1997, ‘Analysing documentary realities’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, pp. 45–62, Sage, London.
Barley, S.R. & Kunda, G., 2001, ‘Bringing work back in’, Organization Science 12(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122
Billett, S. & Somerville, M., 2004, ‘Transformations at work: Identity and learning’, Studies in Continuing Education 26(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225272
Bowen, G.A., 2009, ‘Document analysis as a qualitative research method’, Qualitative Research Journal 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brewer, M.B., 2003, ‘Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self’, in M.R. Leary & J.P. Tangney (eds.), Handbook of self and identity, pp. 480–491, Guilford, New York, NY.
Brown, A.D., 2006, ‘A narrative approach to collective identities’, Journal of Management 43(4), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00609.x
Brown, A.D., Kornberger, M., Clegg, S.R. & Carter, C., 2010, ‘“Invisible walls” and “silent hierarchies”: A case study of power relations in an architecture firm’, Human Relations 63(4), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709339862
Chreim, S., 2005, ‘The continuity-change duality in narrative of organization identity’, Journal of Management Studies 42(3), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00509.x
Chreim, S., Williams, B. & Hinings, C.R., 2007, ‘Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity’, Academy of Management Journal 50(6), 1515–1539. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28226248
Commission for Employment Equity, Annual report, (2023/2024), Department of Employment and Labour, ISBN No 978–0–621–51034–8.
Cooper, S., & Nicholas, L., 2012, ‘An overview of South African psychology’, International Journal of Psychology 47(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.660160
Corley, K.G., Harquail, C.V., Pratt, M.G., Glynn, M.A., Fiol, M. & Hatch, M.J., 2006, ‘Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence’, Journal of Management Inquiry 15(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605285930
Coupland, C. & Brown, A.D., 2004, ‘Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch Shell’, Journal of Management Studies 41(8), 1325–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00477.x
Crafford, A., 2022, Whiteness and stigma in the workplace – Organization and work in South Africa, Palgrave Macmillan.
Creary, S.J., 2025, ‘Transforming how ambivalence about DEI work is managed in organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13206
DeRue, D.S. & Ashford, S.J., 2010, ‘Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations’, The Academy of Management Review 35(4), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267
Devos, A., 2010, ‘New teachers, mentoring and the discursive formation of professional identity’, Teaching and Teacher Education 26(5), 1219–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.001
Elden, S., 2007, ‘There is a politics of space because space is political’, Radical Philosophy Review 10(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev20071022
Foster, D.H., 1993, ‘On racism: Virulent mythologies and fragile threads’, in L.J. Nicholas (ed.), Psychology and oppression: Critiques and proposals, pp. 55–80, Skotaville, Johannesburg.
Goldie, J., 2012, ‘The formation of professional identity in medical students: Considerations for educators’, Medical Teacher 34(9), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.687476
Gorichanaz, T. & Latham, K.F., 2016, ‘Document phenomenology: A framework for holistic analysis’, Journal of Documentation 72(6), 1114–1133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2016-0007
Klarin, A. & Sharmelly, R., 2019, ‘Strategic sensemaking and political connections in unstable institutional contexts’, Journal of Management Inquiry 30(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619862635
Kock, R.G., 2024, Comparison analysis of the (HPCSA) racial breakdown of IOPs from 2020 to 2024, Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, ScriptWarp Systems, Johannesburg.
Kronenberg, F.C.W., 2018, ‘Everyday enactments of humanity affirmations in post Apartheid South Africa: A phronetic case study of being human as occupation and health’, PhD thesis (Online thesis), University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
Lepisto, D.A., Crosina, E. & Pratt, M.G., 2015, ‘Identity work within and beyond the professions: Toward a theoretical integration and extension’, in A. Desilva & M. Aparicio (eds.), International handbook of professional identities, pp. 11–37, Scientific & Academic Publishing, Rosemead, CA.
Lloyd, S., Roodt, G. & Odendaal, A., 2011, ‘Critical elements in defining work-based identity in a post-apartheid South Africa’, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i1.894
Manganyi, N., 2013, ‘On becoming a psychologist in Apartheid South Africa’, South African Journal of Psychology 43(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246313493597
Martinez, L.R., Sawyer, K.B., Thoroughgood, C.N., Ruggs, E.N. & Smith, N.A., 2017, ‘The importance of being “me”: The relation between authentic identity expression and transgender employees’ work-related attitudes and experiences’, Journal of Applied Psychology 102(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000168
McAdams, D.P., 1996, ‘Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons’, Psychological Inquiry 7(4), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
Merton, R.K., 1958, ‘The functions of the professional association’, The American Journal of Nursing 58(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-195858010-00012
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Morgan, H., 2022, ‘Conducting a qualitative document analysis’, The Qualitative Report 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Naidoo, J., 2018, ‘Memories of my application for membership to the South African Psychological Association’, South African Journal of Psychology 48(4), 407–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318812574
Nicholas, L.J., 2014, ‘A history of South African (SA) psychology’, Universitas Psychologica 13(5), 1983–1991. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy13-5.hsap
Padmanabhanunni, A., Jackson, K., Noordien, Z., Pretorius, T.B. & Bouchard, J.P., 2022, ‘Characterizing the nature of professional training and practice of psychologists in South Africa’, Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique 180(4), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2022.02.012
Pratt, M.G., Rockmann, K.W. & Kaufmann, J.B., 2006, ‘Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents’, Academy of Management Journal 49(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060
Puwar, N., 2004, Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place, Berg, Oxford.
Roberts, L.M. & Caza, B.B., 2025, ‘Positive identity construction in diverse oganizations’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 12, 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-041934
Roberts, L.M. & Creary, S.J., 2012, ‘Positive identity construction: Insights from classical and contemporary theoretical perspectives’, in K.S. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship, pp. 70–83, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., 2013, ‘Struggling for a professional identity: Two newly qualified language teachers’ identity narratives during the first years at work’, Teaching and Teacher Education 30(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.002
Saayman, T. & Crafford, A., 2011, ‘Negotiating work identity’, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology 37(1), 963. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i1.963
Schreuder, D. & Coetzee, M., 2010, ‘An overview of industrial and organisational psychology research in South Africa: A preliminary study’, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 36(1), Art. #903. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i1.903
Slay, H.S. & Smith, D.A., 2011, ‘Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities’, Human Relations 64(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710384290
Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), 2020, Navigating a tailored internship in lockdown: Focus group findings, Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), Johannesburg.
Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), 2021a, BIOP Caucus findings: Systemic barriers, social capital, and career mobility challenges, Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), Johannesburg.
Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), 2021b, BIOP Caucus concept presentation: Formalizing advocacy for BIOPs in South Africa, Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA), Johannesburg.
Trede, F., 2012, ‘Role of work-integrated learning in developing professionalism and professional identity’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 13(3), 159–167.
Van Ausdale, D. & Feagin, J.R., 2001, The first R: How children learn race and racism, Rowan and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
Van Niekerk, A., Oosthuizen, R.M. & Coetzee, M., 2024, ‘Industrial and organisational psychology internship completion: Enabling and thwarting factors’, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 50, a2051. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2051
Wald, H.S., 2015, ‘Professional identity (trans)formation in medical education: Reflection, relationship, resilience’, Academic Medicine 90(6), 701–706. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000731
Wood, L.M., Sebar, B. & Vecchio, N., 2020, ‘Application of rigour and credibility in qualitative document analysis: Lessons learnt from a case study’, The Qualitative Report 25(2), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4240
Footnotes
1. The 2010 annual report is the first mention of transformation in the documents available for review.
2. Thanks to the Editor for pointing this out and challenging us to expand our argument in this regard.
|
Hide
Show all
Email this article (Login required)
